Share:

WOODHULL STREET over RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.68186, -74.00581
40°40'55" N, 74°00'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WOODHULL STREET over RTE I278
Structure number:000000001076910
Location:JCT I 278 & I 478
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Total length:31.8 ft. [9.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:95.1 ft. [29.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:35°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1946
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:607 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.0 tons [20.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:67.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$877,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201467.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory607
April 201248.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
June 201148.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
May 201048.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
May 200948.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
May 200848.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
July 200648.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
July 200548.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
July 200448.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
June 200348.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
April 200248.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
June 200148.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
November 200033.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair9545
August 199948.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory9545
October 199849.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory5400
October 199733.5Structurally deficientFairPoorFair5400
November 199628.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair5400
November 199428.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor5400
December 199228.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor5400
November 199128.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor5400