Share:

RAMP TO HRD SB over RAMP TO 95I & 87I

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.84548, -73.93068
40°50'44" N, 73°55'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RAMP TO HRD SB over RAMP TO 95I & 87I
Structure number:000000001076940
Location:JCT I87+I95
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:102.7 ft. [31.3 m]
Total length:330.7 ft. [100.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:31.8 ft. [9.7 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:94.4 tons [85.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$15,736,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201577.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-
November 201462.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair25515
October 201262.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair25515
December 201075.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25515
December 200875.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25515
December 200675.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25515
September 200475.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25515
October 200275.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25515
November 200075.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory25515
December 199875.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory25515
December 199639.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor20848
August 199455.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair20000
October 199253.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair20000
October 199039.5Structurally deficientFairFairPoor20000