Share:

RTE 907P over RTE 907P, RTE 907P, RTE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.83586, -73.93486
40°50'09" N, 73°56'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 907P over RTE 907P, RTE 907P, RTE
Structure number:000000001077050
Location:5.8 MI NE FDR DR+ROUTE 25
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:108.9 ft. [33.2 m]
Total length:835.0 ft. [254.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.4 ft. [5.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,300 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:104.8 tons [95.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$34,325,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201472.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair3300
March 201273.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair3300
April 201073.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair3300
May 200873.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3300
June 200661.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3300
March 200461.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3300
May 200261.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3300
August 200061.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3300
August 199861.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3300
September 199647.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor3300
September 199447.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor3300
October 199247.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor3300
December 199032.0Structurally deficientFairPoorSerious3300