Share:

69TH STREET over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.72517, -73.89482
40°43'31" N, 73°53'41" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:69TH STREET over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000002065950
Location:1.7 MI SE JCT I278+I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:82.7 ft. [25.2 m]
Total length:151.9 ft. [46.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:85.8 tons [78.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,173,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201580.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair-
July 201374.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory19019
July 201174.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory19900
May 200974.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory19910
May 200774.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory21249
May 200573.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory19019
May 200373.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory19019
June 200174.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good19217
June 199974.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood19217
November 199774.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory19217
September 199564.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair19000
September 199348.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor19000
November 199165.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair19000