Share:

RTE 495 over 74TH STREET

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.72763, -73.88724
40°43'39" N, 73°53'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 495 over 74TH STREET
Structure number:000000002065973
Location:2.1 MI ESE JCT I278 &I495
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:108.9 ft. [33.2 m]
Total length:110.9 ft. [33.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:158,270 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:83.8 tons [76.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$130,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201588.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory158270
May 201392.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood79135
June 201195.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodExcellent3403
June 200992.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodExcellent81495
June 200792.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentExcellent79135
June 200595.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood3403
May 200391.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentExcellent3403
April 200191.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good3403
January 199991.8Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactoryGood3403
April 199791.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodExcellent16427
May 199590.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16427
May 199386.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good65000
March 199186.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good65000