Share:

RTE 27 over 4TH AVENUE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66537, -73.99286
40°39'55" N, 73°59'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 27 over 4TH AVENUE
Structure number:000000002067889
Location:.1 MI SE JCT I278+27
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:128.0 ft. [39.0 m]
Total length:129.9 ft. [39.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:77.1 ft. [23.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:62,787 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:90.9 tons [82.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.8
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$279,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201490.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory62787
June 201290.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory62800
June 201091.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory50562
July 200890.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good64191
March 200688.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good101665
April 200493.6Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good69061
April 200293.9Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good63519
February 200091.9Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good63519
February 199877.4Not deficientExcellentGoodFair63519
June 199773.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodFair68750
February 199643.2Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor68750
April 199548.2Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor68750
April 199454.2Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor12234
April 199348.9Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor68750
February 199247.3Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor80533
September 199045.4Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor80533