Share:

RTE I278 over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.82260, -73.88640
40°49'21" N, 73°53'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W
Structure number:000000002075351
Location:JCT I95 & I278
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:120.7 ft. [36.8 m]
Total length:122.7 ft. [37.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:61.0 ft. [18.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:94.5 ft. [28.8 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Skew angle:41°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1975
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:55,675 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:108.8 tons [98.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:85.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$14,714,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201485.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory55675
November 201285.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentGoodSatisfactory55650
November 201169.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair98400
November 201069.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair52349
November 200869.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair52349
August 200669.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair50714
August 200469.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair98400
July 200269.0Structurally deficientPoorFairFair99774
July 200077.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory118431
August 199982.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory104888
December 199880.0Structurally deficientSeriousFairSatisfactory134231
October 199780.0Structurally deficientSeriousFairFair65323
July 199663.8Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor65323
November 199549.9Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor64350
November 199449.9Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor41575
December 199349.9Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor41575
May 199249.9Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor63663
September 199051.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor63663