Share:

TUCKER ROAD over KENYONTOWN CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.46226, -73.93931
43°27'44" N, 73°56'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:TUCKER ROAD over KENYONTOWN CREEK
Structure number:000000002203520
Location:3 MI N OF STONY CREEK
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year reconstructed:2009
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:9 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:18.9 tons [17.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:11.0 tons [10.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:39.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$10,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201539.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9
July 201437.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9
August 201347.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9
July 201247.6Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory10
July 201147.6Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory10
August 201047.6Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory43
August 200947.6Not deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory9
August 200832.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9
July 200732.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9
June 200632.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9
May 200532.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair43
September 200432.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair43
July 200332.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair43
September 200232.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair43
June 200146.5Not deficientExcellentVery GoodFair43
June 200046.5Not deficientExcellentVery GoodFair43
May 199924.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSerious43
June 199854.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood43
May 199724.0Structurally deficientVery GoodGoodSerious43
June 199626.5Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySerious2
May 199446.9Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryFair2
April 199241.3Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair2
April 199042.3Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair2