Share:

RTE 9 over RTE 907V, AMTRAK

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.78556, -73.98406
40°47'08" N, 73°59'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 9 over RTE 907V, AMTRAK
Structure number:000000002229290
Location:JCT OF RTE 9A + 79 ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Total length:74.8 ft. [22.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.3 ft. [13.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1937
Year reconstructed:1975
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,054 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:65.9 tons [59.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.3 tons [21.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:49.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,772,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201449.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15054
June 201249.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15054
October 201049.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory15054
December 200953.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair15054
December 200853.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair15054
September 200653.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair15054
October 200457.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15054
September 200257.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair14113
October 200072.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair14113
June 199872.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair14113
May 199653.5Structurally deficientFairFairPoor14113
June 199471.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair9200
June 199254.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair9200
April 199046.3Structurally deficientFairFairPoor9200