RTE 907V over RTE 907V, RTE 907V


+40.84496, -73.94487
40°50'42" N, 73°56'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907V over RTE 907V, RTE 907V
Structure number:000000002229350
Location:4.6 MI NE ROUTE 9A+79 ST
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:81.7 ft. [24.9 m]
Total length:1093.9 ft. [333.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:1986
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:19
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:26,300 [as of 1964]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.9 tons [35.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:51.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$10,703,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201451.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair26300
November 201251.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair26300
October 201063.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26300
November 200863.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26300
June 200663.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26300
July 200463.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26300
October 200262.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26300
August 200062.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26300
October 199862.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood26300
November 199632.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor26300
November 199438.0Not deficientPoorFairPoor26300
November 199238.0Not deficientPoorPoorPoor26300
November 199040.0Not deficientFairFairPoor26300