252 STREET over RTE 907V, RTE 907V


+40.89927, -73.90708
40°53'57" N, 73°54'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:252 STREET over RTE 907V, RTE 907V
Structure number:000000002229500
Location:1.8 MI NE H.HUDSON BR+9A
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:40.7 ft. [12.4 m]
Total length:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.2 ft. [9.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.8 ft. [3.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1938
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,290 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:75.9 tons [69.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.0 tons [40.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:77.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,683,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201477.0Not deficient-SatisfactorySatisfactory4290
January 201277.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood4290
February 201077.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood4290
February 200859.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentFair4290
February 200628.2Structurally deficient-PoorFair4290
February 200428.2Structurally deficient-PoorFair4290
February 200224.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair4003
January 200026.4Structurally deficientFairPoorFair4003
April 199824.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair4003
February 199639.4Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2000
March 199439.4Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2000
March 199239.4Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2000
May 199044.3Structurally deficient-PoorFair2000