Share:

RTE 907F over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.85651, -73.83542
40°51'23" N, 73°50'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 907F over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W
Structure number:000000002229560
Location:2.4 MI N I278&I678
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:81.7 ft. [24.9 m]
Total length:235.9 ft. [71.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:104.3 ft. [31.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Skew angle:55°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1907
Year reconstructed:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:45,267 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:50.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$20,026,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201450.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair45267
May 201250.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairFair45300
June 201050.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairFair45028
November 200850.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairFair45028
August 200650.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairSatisfactory45028
November 200450.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairSatisfactory45028
July 200250.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairSatisfactory42034
July 200054.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairSatisfactory42034
December 199853.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairGood42034
July 199639.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair31235
December 199436.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair48100
December 199236.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair48100
September 199036.8Not deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair48100