Share:

CYPRESS HILL ST over RTE 908B

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.69221, -73.88259
40°41'32" N, 73°52'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CYPRESS HILL ST over RTE 908B
Structure number:000000002230040
Location:3.4 MI SW JT SH25 & IB PK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:61.7 ft. [18.8 m]
Total length:70.9 ft. [21.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Skew angle:28°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1937
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,982 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.2 tons [56.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.4 tons [20.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:61.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$9,181,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201461.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood18982
April 201261.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood19000
April 201061.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood21436
April 200865.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood21436
May 200665.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood21436
May 200465.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood21436
July 200265.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood19751
September 200065.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood19751
November 199849.6Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory19751
December 199635.4Structurally deficient-PoorFair17993
October 199423.3Structurally deficient-PoorFair11000
October 199223.3Structurally deficient-PoorPoor11000
December 199045.8Structurally deficient-PoorPoor11000