Share:

MYRTLE AVE over RTE 908B

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70292, -73.85825
40°42'11" N, 73°51'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:MYRTLE AVE over RTE 908B
Structure number:000000002230120
Location:1.8MI SW 25+INTERBRO PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Total length:100.7 ft. [30.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:10.5 ft. [3.2 m]
Skew angle:52°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1937
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,685 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:77.2 tons [70.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.5 tons [25.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:86.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,850,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201486.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood10685
April 201286.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood10700
May 201086.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood12518
May 200886.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood13605
February 200686.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood12518
March 200469.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood12518
April 200269.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood12084
March 200065.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory12084
April 199865.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory12084
April 199653.7Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory13527
April 199453.7Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory12000
June 199253.7Structurally deficientPoorFairFair12000
August 199060.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair12000