Share:

RTE 908 over METRO NORTH RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.86833, -73.87986
40°52'06" N, 73°52'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 908 over METRO NORTH RR
Structure number:000000002230260
Location:MOSHOLU PKWY / METRO NO R
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Total length:110.9 ft. [33.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Skew angle:12°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1905
Year reconstructed:1992
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:30,154 [as of 1996]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:104.8 tons [95.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$297,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201492.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood30154
April 201292.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood30154
May 201092.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood30154
April 200892.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood30154
March 200692.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood30154
April 200492.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good30154
March 200290.7Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodVery Good30154
March 200096.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good30154
November 199896.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good30154
August 199696.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory30154
August 199480.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory17900
October 199280.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory17900
March 199234.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor15029