Share:

JEROME AVENUE over 908FX, RAPID TRANSIT

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.87977, -73.88471
40°52'47" N, 73°53'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:JEROME AVENUE over 908FX, RAPID TRANSIT
Structure number:000000002230287
Location:.7 MI S I87+MOSHOLU PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:59.7 ft. [18.2 m]
Total length:120.7 ft. [36.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:97.4 ft. [29.7 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:8.5 ft. [2.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:8.5 ft. [2.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1910
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,874 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:38.2 tons [34.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:16.7 tons [15.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:60.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,591,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201560.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood14874
May 201360.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood14874
April 201160.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood14900
May 200965.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood17995
May 200766.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood18933
April 200566.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood17995
May 200365.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood17995
June 200159.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood17995
October 199930.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory17995
February 199849.4Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory14781
February 199636.2Structurally deficient-PoorFair14781
January 199436.2Structurally deficient-PoorPoor12800
February 199236.2Structurally deficient-PoorPoor12800
April 199043.7Structurally deficient-PoorPoor12800