SACKETT ST over RTE I278, RTE I278


+40.68467, -74.00120
40°41'05" N, 74°00'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SACKETT ST over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230370
Location:.4 MI NE I278+BATTERY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:39.7 ft. [12.1 m]
Total length:80.7 ft. [24.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.4 ft. [18.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,074 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:43.9 tons [39.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:82.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$4,749,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201482.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory2074
March 201282.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory1781
March 201093.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1781
April 200893.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1871
February 200693.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1781
March 200493.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1781
April 200293.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2743
March 200093.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2743
April 199880.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair2743
June 199664.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor2743
April 199547.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor3350
March 199447.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor3350
January 199247.0Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor3350
January 199061.0Structurally deficientPoorFairFair3350