Share:

RTE I278 over PROSPECT STREET

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70060, -73.98553
40°42'02" N, 73°59'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over PROSPECT STREET
Structure number:000000002230430
Location:.2 MI SE I278 + BKLYN BRG
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:54.8 ft. [16.7 m]
Total length:58.7 ft. [17.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:40,395 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:93.0 tons [84.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,177,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201476.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good40395
January 201276.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good40395
January 201076.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good40395
February 200876.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good40395
January 200676.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good40395
February 200476.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good40395
March 200276.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good169791
January 200078.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good169791
February 199865.0Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory169791
May 199665.3Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair169791
February 199449.9Structurally deficient-PoorFair169791
February 199249.9Structurally deficient-PoorFair169791
September 199049.9Structurally deficient-PoorFair169791