Share:

RTE I278 over ADAMS STREET

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70141, -73.98863
40°42'05" N, 73°59'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over ADAMS STREET
Structure number:000000002230440
Location:0.2 MI E JCT I278 & BK BR
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Total length:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:86,608 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:65.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,889,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201465.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good86608
January 201265.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good86608
January 201065.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good86608
January 200865.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good106079
January 200665.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good86608
February 200464.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good86608
March 200253.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood86441
January 200064.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good153065
January 199853.0Functionally obsolete-FairGood112599
January 199639.0Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory121124
January 199439.0Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory121124
January 199239.0Structurally deficient-PoorFair113505
April 199039.0Structurally deficient-PoorFair116119