Share:

RTE I278 over ADAMS STREET

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70131, -73.98864
40°42'05" N, 73°59'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over ADAMS STREET
Structure number:000000002230450
Location:.2 MI E I278 + BKLYN BDGE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Total length:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.4 ft. [11.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:106,102 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,676,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201480.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good106102
January 201252.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairVery Good106100
January 201052.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairVery Good124836
January 200852.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairVery Good106079
February 200652.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairVery Good124836
February 200452.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairVery Good86608
March 200252.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairVery Good86441
January 200063.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good153065
January 199852.3Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory112599
January 199638.2Structurally deficient-PoorFair121124
January 199438.2Structurally deficient-PoorFair121124
January 199238.2Structurally deficient-PoorFair113505
April 199052.2Functionally obsolete-FairFair116119