RTE I278 over 278I278IX2MR11B


+40.69625, -73.98037
40°41'47" N, 73°58'49" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I278 over 278I278IX2MR11B
Structure number:000000002230500
Location:.4 MI SE I278+BKLYN BR
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:40.7 ft. [12.4 m]
Total length:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.2 ft. [8.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,450 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.7 tons [80.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.2 tons [29.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:89.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,995,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201489.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5450
February 201289.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5450
March 201089.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5450
March 200889.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5450
March 200689.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5450
March 200491.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5450
March 200272.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood99900
January 200074.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good99900
March 199861.0Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory99900
May 199647.8Structurally deficient-PoorFair99900
June 199447.8Structurally deficient-PoorFair99900
April 199263.0Functionally obsolete-FairFair99900
November 199082.0Functionally obsolete-FairFair99900