Share:

RTE I278 over NASSAU STREET, CONCORD S

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.69836, -73.98297
40°41'54" N, 73°58'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over NASSAU STREET, CONCORD S
Structure number:000000002230510
Location:.6 MI SE I278+BKLYN BR
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:143.7 ft. [43.8 m]
Total length:681.8 ft. [207.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:70.5 ft. [21.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:75.8 ft. [23.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:115,298 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:76.9 tons [69.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:81.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$961,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201481.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory115298
June 201262.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory115300
June 201062.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory124836
December 200951.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentFairFair92177
July 200837.0Structurally deficientExcellentPoorSatisfactory92177
April 200737.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory92177
March 200651.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory124836
April 200437.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory124836
April 200251.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory153065
January 200062.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood153065
February 199850.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair112599
May 199618.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious108247
May 199417.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious77975
May 199217.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious113505
August 199117.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious103251