Share:

65TH PLACE over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74002, -73.89976
40°44'24" N, 73°53'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:65TH PLACE over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230520
Location:.1 MI SE JCT I278 & SH 25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:66.6 ft. [20.3 m]
Total length:139.1 ft. [42.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:54°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,234 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:68.2 tons [62.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:74.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$777,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201474.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good6234
February 201274.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good6200
February 201074.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good8177
February 200862.0Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair8177
January 200662.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8177
February 200462.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8177
March 200262.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair13117
January 200074.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory13117
January 199861.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodFair13117
February 199647.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor25000
January 199449.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor25000
March 199249.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor25000
June 199063.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair25000