RTE 25 over RTE I278, RTE I278


+40.74085, -73.89874
40°44'27" N, 73°53'55" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 25 over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230530
Location:JCT I278+ROUTE 25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:54.8 ft. [16.7 m]
Total length:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:198.8 ft. [60.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:252.0 ft. [76.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:31°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:45,110 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:91.9 tons [83.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:55.9 tons [50.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,173,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201494.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good45110
November 201294.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good45100
November 201094.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good63570
December 200894.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good63570
October 200694.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory63570
August 200494.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory63570
August 200294.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory63570
June 200082.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory63570
September 199894.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory63570
December 199766.0Structurally deficientFairPoorFair63570
October 199664.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor63570
August 199564.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor63570
August 199464.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor63570
September 199364.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor63570
October 199264.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor63570
December 199066.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor63570