Share:

WOODSIDE AVENUE over RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74287, -73.89649
40°44'34" N, 73°53'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WOODSIDE AVENUE over RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230540
Location:.2 MI NW JCT I278 & SH 25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Total length:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,552 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:103.4 tons [94.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$352,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201475.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8552
February 201275.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory8600
January 201075.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory8552
January 200875.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10178
January 200676.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10070
January 200477.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10070
January 200277.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory9970
January 200077.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory9970
January 199865.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair9970
February 199649.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor6720
February 199450.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor6720
March 199250.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor6720
July 199066.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair6720