70TH STREET over RTE I278, 278I 278IX5M34


+40.74425, -73.89499
40°44'39" N, 73°53'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:70TH STREET over RTE I278, 278I 278IX5M34
Structure number:000000002230560
Location:.3 MI NW JCT I278 & SH 25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Total length:165.0 ft. [50.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:948 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$4,830,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201480.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good948
November 201280.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good751
October 201080.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good751
December 200880.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good751
March 200875.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory751
March 200775.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory751
March 200475.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory751
May 200275.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory864
March 200075.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory864
April 199864.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair864
April 199647.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor720
March 199449.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor1280
March 199249.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor1280
May 199049.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor1280