41ST AVENUE over RTE I278, 278I 278IX5M33


+40.74475, -73.89477
40°44'41" N, 73°53'41" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:41ST AVENUE over RTE I278, 278I 278IX5M33
Structure number:000000002230570
Location:.3 MI NW JCT I278 & SH25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Total length:129.9 ft. [39.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,385 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:77.9 tons [70.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:75.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$4,830,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201675.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3385
October 201475.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2319
November 201275.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good2319
October 201075.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood2319
November 200875.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood2417
March 200875.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory2319
March 200775.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory2319
February 200475.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory2319
March 200275.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory2692
March 200075.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory2692
April 199849.0Structurally deficientFairGoodPoor2692
April 199647.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor2080
March 199446.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor2500
March 199246.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor2500
July 199046.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor2500