Share:

ROOSEVELT AVENUE over RTE I278, RTE I278, IRT

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74651, -73.89495
40°44'47" N, 73°53'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ROOSEVELT AVENUE over RTE I278, RTE I278, IRT
Structure number:000000002230587
Location:.4 MI NE JCT I278 & SH25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:66.6 ft. [20.3 m]
Total length:133.9 ft. [40.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:82.4 ft. [25.1 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Year reconstructed:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,000 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:94.8 tons [86.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:74.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$309,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201574.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory12000
September 201376.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good15830
October 201176.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good15830
October 200976.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good10294
December 200776.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good10294
February 200663.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair15830
February 200463.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair15830
March 200264.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15830
January 200064.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15830
January 199864.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15830
February 199649.0Structurally deficientFairFairPoor16756
January 199447.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor16000
February 199247.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor16000
February 199049.0Structurally deficientFairFairPoor16000