Share:

STEINWAY ST over RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.76901, -73.91076
40°46'08" N, 73°54'39" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:STEINWAY ST over RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230600
Location:.4 MI W I278+GCP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Total length:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:83.0 ft. [25.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:31°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1937
Year reconstructed:2006
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,426 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:76.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$5,597,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201476.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good17426
September 201276.0Not deficientGoodExcellentVery Good17400
October 201076.0Not deficientGoodExcellentVery Good16145
October 200875.0Not deficientGoodExcellentVery Good17737
November 200665.2Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent14389
January 200461.6Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory16145
February 200251.1Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory10000
January 200050.1Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory10000
January 199850.1Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory10000
January 199637.0Structurally deficient-PoorFair10000
January 199437.0Structurally deficient-PoorPoor10000
February 199237.0Structurally deficient-PoorPoor10000
March 199043.8Structurally deficient-PoorPoor10000