35TH STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE


+40.76981, -73.91460
40°46'11" N, 73°54'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:35TH STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE
Structure number:000000002230630
Location:.6 MI W I278+GCP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Total length:167.0 ft. [50.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.2 ft. [15.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1935
Year reconstructed:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,364 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$1,951,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201477.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood3364
March 201277.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood3350
April 201077.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood3364
April 200877.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood3364
June 200677.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood3364
July 200477.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood3364
August 200277.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood3719
June 200068.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3719
September 199866.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3719
October 199636.9Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor3094
August 199436.9Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor3094
May 199317.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious3094
November 199217.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious3094
November 199125.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious3094