Share:

32ND STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.77007, -73.91669
40°46'12" N, 73°55'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:32ND STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230640
Location:32 STREET AND 278IX
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Total length:99.7 ft. [30.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:81.0 ft. [24.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:23°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1930
Year reconstructed:1981
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:100.8 tons [91.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,798,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201591.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-
June 201375.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5368
June 201175.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5368
June 200975.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5368
June 200775.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5368
May 200575.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5368
April 200375.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5368
May 200175.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4525
February 199975.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4525
May 199744.0Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryPoor8640
May 199552.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor8640
May 199352.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor8640
January 199160.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor8640