RTE I278 over 32ND AVENUE


+40.75621, -73.89997
40°45'22" N, 73°53'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I278 over 32ND AVENUE
Structure number:000000002230710
Location:.2 MI N JCT I278 & SH 25A
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Total length:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:53.8 ft. [16.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:57.7 ft. [17.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Skew angle:18°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:73.8 tons [67.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:100.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,949,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 2015100.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-
June 2013100.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good49417
August 201198.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent49417
August 200998.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent49417
August 200798.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good49417
September 200598.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good49417
August 200398.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent49417
March 200360.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair116580
August 200060.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair116580
October 199864.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair116580
December 199649.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor116580
October 199466.0Structurally deficientPoorFairFair116580
October 199250.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor116580
December 199052.0Structurally deficientFairFairPoor116580