49TH ST over RTE I278, RTE I278


+40.76572, -73.90360
40°45'57" N, 73°54'13" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:49TH ST over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230800
Location:.8 MI NW JCT I278 & SH 25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:52.8 ft. [16.1 m]
Total length:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:39°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1942
Year reconstructed:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,714 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,759,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201476.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9714
April 201276.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9714
April 201076.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory9714
April 200876.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory10124
March 200676.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9714
March 200475.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory9714
May 200275.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory10303
March 200076.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory10303
May 199865.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryFair10303
May 199665.0Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory6400
April 199465.0Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory6400
April 199247.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor6400
June 199047.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor6400