+40.69386, -73.99915
40°41'38" N, 73°59'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I278 over RTE I278, JORALEMON ST
Structure number:000000002230857
Location:.7 MI SW I278+BKLYN BR
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Total length:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1948
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:67,395 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:107.8 tons [98.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:54.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$542,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201454.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good67395
March 201254.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good67100
March 201050.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good122522
May 200854.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good71044
April 200654.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good71070
May 200450.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good122522
May 200249.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good151509
September 200049.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good151509
December 199847.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood137035
November 199648.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory121124
December 199448.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory121124
December 199248.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory113505
October 199056.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory116119