Share:

4TH AVENUE over RTE 907C, RTE 907C

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.61057, -74.03560
40°36'38" N, 74°02'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:4TH AVENUE over RTE 907C, RTE 907C
Structure number:000000002231270
Location:1.2 MI SE 86 ST+SHORE PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Total length:94.8 ft. [28.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.5 ft. [3.8 m]
Skew angle:22°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,742 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.8 tons [57.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.5 tons [21.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:81.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$7,572,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201481.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9742
March 201262.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12519
March 201062.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12519
April 200862.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory13118
March 200662.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory12519
March 200461.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory12519
April 200260.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory12519
January 200060.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory13149
January 199850.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair13149
March 199637.0Structurally deficient-PoorPoor13149
March 199437.9Structurally deficient-PoorPoor5200
February 199237.9Structurally deficient-PoorFair5200
May 199044.7Structurally deficient-PoorFair5200