RTE 907C over RTE 907C, RTE 907C


+40.60373, -74.01927
40°36'13" N, 74°01'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907C over RTE 907C, RTE 907C
Structure number:000000002231290
Location:2.2 MI SE 86ST&SHORE PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:90.9 ft. [27.7 m]
Total length:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Year reconstructed:1992
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,286 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:103.7 tons [94.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:89.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$192,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201589.5Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentGood3286
June 201388.5Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentGood9693
May 201187.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood13409
May 200987.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood13409
May 200787.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood13409
May 200587.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood13409
May 200388.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood13409
May 200188.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood13409
June 199988.8Not deficientVery GoodExcellentGood14199
June 199788.8Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good14199
March 199597.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory1000
19920.0Not deficient---120000