RTE 907C over RTE 907C, RTE 907C, SERV


+40.58441, -73.96158
40°35'04" N, 73°57'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907C over RTE 907C, RTE 907C, SERV
Structure number:000000002231370
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Total length:291.7 ft. [88.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1942
Year reconstructed:2012
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,607 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.7 tons [87.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,089,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201495.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent8607
September 201274.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent8607
April 201217.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory8607
March 201117.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory8607
November 200917.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory8607
August 200848.5Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory8607
September 200748.5Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory8607
May 200648.5Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory8607
May 200435.5Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory8607
May 200235.5Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory8607
May 200045.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory7413
June 199820.5Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor7413
March 199620.3Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor7854
April 199440.0Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor600
February 199240.0Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor600
June 199048.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor600