Share:

FLATBUSH AVENUE over RTE 907C, RTE 907C

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.59655, -73.90795
40°35'48" N, 73°54'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FLATBUSH AVENUE over RTE 907C, RTE 907C
Structure number:000000002231460
Location:8.4 MI SW I678+BELT PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Total length:142.1 ft. [43.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:99.1 ft. [30.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:53,363 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:75.8 tons [68.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,914,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201590.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentVery Good53363
October 201390.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentVery Good38653
September 201190.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentExcellent38653
October 200990.0Not deficientVery GoodExcellentExcellent52520
October 200790.0Not deficientVery GoodExcellentExcellent38653
September 200590.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent38653
September 200390.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent38653
December 200190.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good38653
July 200033.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor38653
September 199933.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor38653
September 199833.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor31240
August 199733.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor31240
May 199633.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor31240
June 199533.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor31240
October 199433.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor31240
December 199333.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious31240
September 199233.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious31240
July 199132.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSerious31240