+40.66609, -73.84169
40°39'58" N, 73°50'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CROSS BAY BLVD over RTE 907C, RTE 907C
Structure number:000000002231559
Location:2.1 MI W I678 & BELT PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:53.8 ft. [16.4 m]
Total length:178.2 ft. [54.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:96.1 ft. [29.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:132.6 ft. [40.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.5 ft. [4.1 m]
Skew angle:17°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Year reconstructed:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:54,594 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:91.9 tons [83.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:73.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$4,048,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201473.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood54594
June 201273.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood52100
June 201073.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood52075
May 200873.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory53563
May 200673.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory52075
April 200461.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory52075
May 200259.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50165
March 200061.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50165
April 199861.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood50165
April 199635.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor40490
March 199435.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor40490
March 199261.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory40490
May 199069.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair40490