Share:

RTE I878 over RTE 907D, RTE 907D

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66685, -73.83863
40°40'01" N, 73°50'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I878 over RTE 907D, RTE 907D
Structure number:000000002231560
Location:2 MI W I678 & BELT PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:123.7 ft. [37.7 m]
Total length:233.0 ft. [71.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.6 ft. [19.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.6 ft. [20.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:83,975 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:103.7 tons [94.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$347,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201480.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodFair83975
July 201280.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodFair84000
July 201081.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodFair58577
July 200881.7Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodFair58577
July 200692.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood45033
April 200492.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood45033
May 200291.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood62170
March 200090.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good62170
April 199890.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood62170
April 199623.7Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair31074
March 199476.5Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair60000
April 199276.5Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair60000
January 199077.5Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryFair60000