Share:

COHANCY ST over RTE 907D, RTE 907D

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66646, -73.83485
40°39'59" N, 73°50'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:COHANCY ST over RTE 907D, RTE 907D
Structure number:000000002231570
Location:1.8 MI W I678 & BELT PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Total length:112.9 ft. [34.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.8 ft. [3.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,349 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.5 tons [55.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.5 tons [22.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:52.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,850,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201652.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair9349
April 201433.3Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair8957
April 201233.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair9400
May 201033.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair9751
May 200833.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair9751
April 200636.4Structurally deficientGoodPoorFair9751
April 200436.4Structurally deficientGoodPoorFair9751
May 200233.9Structurally deficientGoodPoorFair14335
March 200033.9Structurally deficient-PoorFair14335
April 199833.9Structurally deficientGoodPoorSatisfactory14335
May 199638.5Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2500
April 199436.6Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2500
June 199238.7Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2500
September 199047.6Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2500