Share:

SPRINGFIELD BLVD over RTE 907D, RTE 907D

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66602, -73.75800
40°39'58" N, 73°45'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SPRINGFIELD BLVD over RTE 907D, RTE 907D
Structure number:000000002231630
Location:2.2 MI E I678+BELT PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Total length:97.8 ft. [29.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Skew angle:16°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,335 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.2 tons [55.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.0 tons [20.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$12,636,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201468.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory16335
May 201268.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory16400
May 201068.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory15776
May 200868.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory15776
April 200668.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory15776
April 200447.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory15776
June 200247.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory14692
March 200048.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair14692
April 199867.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory14692
May 199649.6Structurally deficient-PoorPoor17415
May 199450.9Structurally deficient-PoorPoor13510
June 199236.9Structurally deficient-PoorFair13510
October 199040.8Structurally deficient-PoorPoor13510