225TH ST over RTE 907D, RTE 907D


+40.66574, -73.75218
40°39'57" N, 73°45'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:225TH ST over RTE 907D, RTE 907D
Structure number:000000002231640
Location:2.6 MI E JCT I678 & BL PK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:52.8 ft. [16.1 m]
Total length:103.7 ft. [31.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.5 ft. [3.8 m]
Skew angle:26°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1986
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,530 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.2 tons [54.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.6 tons [20.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:49.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$8,836,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201449.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair12530
May 201249.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair12530
May 201049.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair12530
June 200849.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair12530
June 200650.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair12530
May 200450.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair12530
June 200248.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair11118
April 200048.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair11118
July 199848.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair11118
July 199632.6Structurally deficient-PoorPoor7200
June 199433.2Structurally deficient-PoorPoor7200
April 199233.2Structurally deficient-PoorPoor7200
June 199045.6Structurally deficient-FairPoor7200