Share:

N CONDUIT AVE WB over RTE 907B

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66637, -73.74026
40°39'59" N, 73°44'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:N CONDUIT AVE WB over RTE 907B
Structure number:000000002231680
Location:5.6MI S GCP+CRSS 1SL PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:54.8 ft. [16.7 m]
Total length:116.8 ft. [35.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:10.2 ft. [3.1 m]
Skew angle:50°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1936
Year reconstructed:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,878 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.7 tons [55.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.3 tons [20.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:67.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$11,050,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201467.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood2878
January 201267.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood2900
January 201067.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood2630
February 200867.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood2630
January 200668.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood2630
January 200468.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory2630
February 200268.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory2630
January 200067.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory2630
February 199867.6Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory2630
February 199640.3Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2630
February 199438.3Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2630
February 199240.3Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2630
March 199049.0Structurally deficient-PoorPoor2630