Share:

FRANCIS LEWIS BVD over RTE 907B

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66875, -73.73815
40°40'07" N, 73°44'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FRANCIS LEWIS BVD over RTE 907B
Structure number:000000002231700
Location:5.4MI S GCP+CRSS ISL PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:76.8 ft. [23.4 m]
Total length:81.7 ft. [24.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:10.5 ft. [3.2 m]
Skew angle:35°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1954
Year reconstructed:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,009 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.1 tons [61.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.9 tons [21.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:49.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,383,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201449.9Functionally obsolete-FairGood7009
March 201249.9Functionally obsolete-FairGood7000
April 201049.5Functionally obsolete-FairGood10310
April 200849.5Functionally obsolete-FairGood10310
March 200649.5Not deficient-FairGood10310
March 200449.5Functionally obsolete-FairGood10310
April 200248.0Functionally obsolete-FairGood10310
February 200047.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairSatisfactory10310
April 199847.9Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory10310
April 199628.4Structurally deficient-PoorFair10310
March 199429.3Structurally deficient-PoorFair10310
May 199334.0Structurally deficient-PoorFair10310
May 199210.8Structurally deficient-PoorFair10310
June 199041.5Structurally deficient-PoorFair10310