Share:

130TH AVENUE over RTE 907B

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.67872, -73.72971
40°40'43" N, 73°43'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:130TH AVENUE over RTE 907B
Structure number:000000002231730
Location:4.6 MI S JCT GCP & CI PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Total length:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,240 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:64.1 tons [58.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.2 tons [22.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:82.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$4,709,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201482.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good5240
January 201282.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good5200
January 201081.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryVery Good10792
January 200882.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good5849
January 200681.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good10792
January 200480.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood10792
January 200281.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood3510
January 200081.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3510
February 199881.8Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory3510
February 199672.4Functionally obsolete-FairFair3510
February 199472.5Functionally obsolete-FairFair3510
February 199271.5Functionally obsolete-FairFair3510
February 199078.7Functionally obsolete-FairFair3510