Share:

RTE 24 over RTE 907A, RTE 907A

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.71119, -73.72817
40°42'40" N, 73°43'41" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 24 over RTE 907A, RTE 907A
Structure number:000000002231780
Location:2.4 MI S JCT GCP & CI PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:59.7 ft. [18.2 m]
Total length:141.7 ft. [43.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:10.8 ft. [3.3 m]
Skew angle:49°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1939
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:31,139 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.4 tons [55.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.3 tons [20.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:60.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$20,512,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201460.9Structurally deficientPoorFairFair31139
February 201260.9Structurally deficientPoorFairFair31100
February 201062.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair33183
February 200862.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair40483
March 200662.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair40817
April 200463.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29500
June 200262.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29500
May 200163.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair29500
January 200046.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair29500
January 199923.1Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor29500
April 199825.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor29500
May 199725.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor29500
May 199618.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor29500
April 199521.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor29500
March 199421.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor29500
May 199318.9Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor29500
May 199218.9Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor29500
September 199134.3Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor29500