RTE 25 over RTE 907A, RTE 907A


+40.72546, -73.72431
40°43'32" N, 73°43'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 25 over RTE 907A, RTE 907A
Structure number:000000002231819
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:40.7 ft. [12.4 m]
Total length:99.7 ft. [30.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:115.2 ft. [35.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Skew angle:31°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1939
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,228 [as of 1999]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:64.8 tons [58.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.5 tons [22.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:52.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,579,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201452.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory23228
March 201252.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory23228
March 201052.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory37666
March 200852.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory33591
March 200652.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory23228
February 200452.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory23228
March 200250.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory23228
February 200048.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory23228
April 199821.4Structurally deficient-PoorFair23228
May 199616.0Structurally deficient-SeriousPoor16090
March 199421.2Structurally deficient-PoorPoor16090
March 199236.5Structurally deficient-PoorPoor16090
March 199041.8Structurally deficient-PoorFair16090