RTE 25 over RTE 907A, RTE 907A


+40.72527, -73.72435
40°43'31" N, 73°43'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 25 over RTE 907A, RTE 907A
Structure number:000000002231829
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Total length:99.7 ft. [30.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.8 ft. [3.6 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1939
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:37,843 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.2 tons [22.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:52.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$8,027,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201552.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory37843
March 201451.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory37843
May 201351.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory37535
March 201251.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory37700
August 201151.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory20138
March 201051.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory37666
May 200951.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory33591
March 200851.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory20138
March 200651.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory36582
February 200466.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory20138
March 200263.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory20138
February 200069.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory20138
February 199854.6Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory20138
March 199654.5Structurally deficient-PoorFair20138
February 199473.2Functionally obsolete-FairFair20138
March 199254.2Functionally obsolete-FairFair20138
April 199060.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair20138