Share:

RTE 907L over RTE 907L, RTE 907L, RTE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70782, -74.00003
40°42'28" N, 74°00'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 907L over RTE 907L, RTE 907L, RTE
Structure number:00000000223201A
Location:.9 MI NE FDR DR+BATTERY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:103.7 ft. [31.6 m]
Total length:1112.9 ft. [339.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1954
Year reconstructed:2014
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:17
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,545 [as of 1999]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.0 tons [20.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:51.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,373,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201451.3Not deficientExcellentSatisfactoryFair8545
April 201254.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactoryFair8545
April 201053.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8545
February 200853.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8545
March 200637.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair8545
February 200462.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8545
March 200257.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8545
March 200057.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair8545
March 199864.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory8545
June 199628.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor40728
September 199428.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor40728
September 199213.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor40728
July 199130.0Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor40728